99 Francs
sales@99francs.agency

HQ Paphos, Cyprus · worldwide

Framer vs Webflow vs Astro in 2026: Which to Pick for Your Site

By Alexander VinokurovFounder · Creative Director

Framer, Webflow or Astro? A practitioner's comparison: what each tool is for, current plan prices, a side-by-side table, a verdict per project type and what each build costs with us.

Framer vs Webflow vs Astro in 2026: Which to Pick for Your Site

These are three different kinds of tool. Framer and Webflow are visual builders that host your site. Astro is a code framework: you or your developer own the files and put them on any host. The right choice depends less on features than on who edits the site next month.

What each one is

Framer is a design-first builder with fast publishing and strong animation. Good for pages that must look distinctive and ship this week.

Webflow is a visual builder with a real CMS, collections, forms and a mature ecosystem of designers and agencies. Good when a team keeps adding pages and posts.

Astro is a framework that ships pages as plain HTML and loads JavaScript only where a component needs it. The content lives in files or a headless CMS. Good for speed and control, with a developer in the loop.

The comparison table

CriterionFramerWebflowAstro
Editing for marketersEasy, visual, close to the designEasy for content in the Designer or Editor; extra seats cost US$15–39 a month eachNeeds a CMS added; files otherwise
CMSBuilt in, by plan limitsBuilt in, strongest of the threeFiles, or any headless CMS you connect
Design freedomHigh for layout and motionHigh, with custom code and InteractionsTotal, because it is code
PerformanceGood, platform-managedGood, platform-managedBest by default, you control what loads
SEO controlGood basicsGood, mature settingsFull: markup, redirects, schema, routing
Hosting cost per monthFree, US$10 Basic, US$30 Pro (billed yearly)Free, US$15 Basic, US$25 Premium (billed yearly)US$0 on a free tier, US$20 on a paid host
Lock-inHigh: the site lives on FramerMedium-high: exports are partialLow: your code, any host
Typical build with usLanding from US$1,500; site from US$3,000Landing from US$1,500; site from US$3,000; migration US$1,500–4,500Landing from US$1,500; site from US$3,000; migration US$1,500–5,000

The performance and lock-in rows are our judgement from building on all three, not measured benchmarks. We have not run a head-to-head speed test and do not cite one.

What the platforms cost

Framer (framer.com/pricing): Free US$0 with 1 GB bandwidth; Basic US$10 a month billed yearly (US$15 month to month) with 30 pages, 2 CMS collections, 1,000 CMS items and 50 GB; Pro US$30 a month billed yearly (US$45 month to month) with 150 pages, 10 collections, 2,500 items and 100 GB, with add-ons beyond that. Extra editors are US$20 a month (full) or US$10 (content only). Localization is a US$20 add-on per locale.

Webflow (webflow.com/pricing): Basic US$15 a month billed yearly, with a custom domain, 300 static pages, 10 GB bandwidth and no CMS; Premium US$25 a month billed yearly, with the CMS and bandwidth from 50 GB; Team from US$2,500 a month on an annual contract. One full Workspace seat is included; extra seats are US$39 a month for a full seat or US$15 for a limited seat that edits content and builds pages from components, billed yearly. Team Workspace plans go from a free Starter to Core at US$19 and Growth at US$49 a month billed yearly.

Astro hosting: Astro is free software. Vercel's Hobby plan is US$0 but limited to non-commercial use, so a business site goes on Pro at US$20 a month (vercel.com/pricing). Netlify has a Free plan and Personal at US$9 a month (netlify.com/pricing). Cloudflare Pages has a free plan with 500 builds a month (Cloudflare docs). A small business site usually fits a free or US$9 plan.

For a brochure site the monthly gap is small: US$10–25 against US$0–20. The real differences are who edits, how much CMS you need and what leaving costs.

When to choose which

Choose Framer when the site is a landing page or a small marketing site, one or two people edit it, and design polish and speed to publish matter more than a large CMS. See Framer development.

Choose Webflow when a marketing team adds pages, posts and case studies every month, needs a real CMS and wants to work without a developer. See Webflow development. Watch the seat and bandwidth costs as the team grows.

Choose Astro when the site is content-heavy (hundreds of pages, documentation, a large blog), speed and SEO control are the point, or the site will later share a codebase with an app. You need a developer for changes unless a headless CMS is added. See Astro development and our answer on Astro or Next.js for a marketing website.

Our verdict by project type

ProjectWe recommendWhy
Landing pageFramer, or Astro if you will never edit itFastest to ship; Astro when the page is final and you want no monthly fee
Marketing site with a blogWebflowThe CMS and a team-friendly editor outweigh the monthly fee
Content-heavy siteAstroSpeed, SEO control and hosting cost at scale
Startup site that will grow into an appAstro (or Next.js)One codebase and no migration later

If you are testing an idea before building, a landing page is the cheapest step (MVP cost). If the site is the start of a product, see MVP development.

Real examples from our work

  • ELCora, an English school: a landing page built in Webflow, then moved to Next.js and Payload CMS with the same design, cutting the running cost from US$20 to US$5 a month (case study, and the break-even maths).
  • Kombo, a rooftop restaurant in Trondheim: all eight pages built in Webflow as contractor for Berger Marketing, with GSAP text reveals and separate booking for bar and restaurant (case study).
  • Adaptyx, a biotech: Webflow development for the design studio Fulcrum, with complex scroll animation and a scroll-driven 3D patch (case study).
  • Kyrylo Savenkov, a developer's personal site: designed by us with an Astro foundation, English and Ukrainian versions and light and dark themes (case study).

Moving between them

Leaving a builder is mostly a content and URL job, not a redesign. A Webflow migration is US$1,500–4,500 (Webflow migration); a migration to Astro from WordPress, Webflow or Framer is US$1,500–5,000, with a CMS integration or a redesign quoted separately. A landing page is from US$1,500 and a marketing website from US$3,000, each paid once when it is done, with no deposit. If you are staying on Framer or Webflow and only need the site kept up to date, see Framer and Webflow support; if you are leaving Webflow for code, see Webflow to Next.js.

Sources

FAQ

Frequently asked questions.

Yes at the entry level: Framer Basic is US$10 a month against Webflow Basic at US$15, both billed yearly (prices checked 7 November 2026). Month to month, Framer Basic is US$15. Webflow Basic has no CMS, so for a blog compare Framer Basic or Pro against Webflow Premium at US$25.

By default Astro ships less JavaScript, so it is usually faster, but a well-built Webflow or Framer page can be fast too. We have not benchmarked them head to head.

Yes, if a headless CMS is connected. Without one, changes go through a developer.

Astro, because the code is yours and runs on any host. Framer and Webflow sites live on their platforms.

Yes. A migration to Astro is US$1,500–5,000 and a Webflow migration US$1,500–4,500, depending on size.

Work with 99 Francs

Not sure which one fits your site?

Tell us what the site is for and who will edit it. We will recommend Framer, Webflow or Astro and quote a fixed price, paid once when the site is done.